Post by TechGuruno...its stupid users...Ive run windows for 20 years...and never once
run a av or antispyware program....if your smart about how u use a
pc...theres no need for those sorta programs
a good router is all u need for a firewall (and yes I run a mac and
linux machines as well)
Back in the day (Windows 3.0 --> Windows ME) I ran AV programs as often
as I could. Good training for a sys-admin. As a sys-admin you KNOW the
users are out to get you. In all that time I've only needed it once.
Although recently I did find a trojan disguised as a jpeg (not a problem
as long as you are not running Windows or if you have the file
extensions turned on).
It is one thing if you are only providing support for yourself. It's
another thing if you have to support other users or customers in a live
environment. Let's just say I've been moved to a position recently which
means I have to learn all this stuff.
Post by TechGuruonly for 2 reasons...1..its lighter weight then windows server
2..servers are generally computeres u never really need to interact
with...if its was a desktop environment for a business or
something...their generally gonna be windows server machines
and actually windows server 2003/08 are slowly taking over nix boxes
I generally run Linux and Mac desktops. I'm still learning about
servers. At this point I can do simple LAMP installations and am looking
for a free Mac equivalent (10.4). It's got to the point where I can get
them up and running in about 15 minutes (say an hour for billing). I'd
prefer to have servers running under OpenBSD but I haven't really had
the opportunity for that yet.
The only places I've seen Windows taking over or replacing *NIX
machines in the server market is when there was some sort of
interference by M$, bean counters, or politicians on the M$ payroll. The
military under King George Bush II showed typical results. Replacing BSD
on two subs and a frigate... One sub sank right out of drydock. The
other sub fired all its missiles (they were destroyed after a reboot).
The frigate started shooting at imaginary targets until a reboot.
Another example was a medium sized German city which moved from Windows
to Linux. The politicians got involved after three months and ordered
the change back. As soon as they changed back and looked at the bills,
they ordered another reversal and reinstalled Linux.
I've read books for both Linux and Windows servers. If you can get past
the vocabulary the Linux books make a lot more sense. As an example read
what both groups have to say about configuring a RAID.
Post by TechGuruyes well if linux ever wants to go mainstream...they will have to do 3
things...one make it much more user friendly...2..integrate the
distributions...theres so many..the average person would be wayyy
confused...3...get offical driver support from alot more manufactures
1) Try Linux Mint.
2) Try Linux Mint or Ubuntu.
3) Get the manufacturers to stop taking kickbacks from M$ and open the
code if they don't want to do it themselves.
I use both Linux and Macs on the desktop. Unfortunately both are
starting to bloat and act more like Windows. That's just examples of bad
programming. Even so, I still prefer them to what I have to work with on
Fridays. The supervisor has seen the light. Now to get the bean counters
and boss to take a serious look.
Later
Mike
Post by TechGuruthe best os would be one with the ease of use of windows....the openess
of linux ...the driver support of windows...and could run on macs as
well...and perhaps the lightweightness of linux to...to be able to run
on older hardware
and btw ..I don't think the security of any 3 of the systems differs
much...like I said its the users habbits
It is the very insecurity of Windows which encourages bad behaviour
Considering most servers on the net are running *NIX variants
It was designed with "ease of use"